Category Archives: Super-Hero Stuff

General ramblings about anything super-hero related, from comics to films.

Hellboy II Review

"Better late than never" is my motto when it comes to movie reviews and employment, so in order to keep the latter I shall obey the former and offer up my belated review of "Hellboy II: The Golden Army". For those of you who, like me, have a short attention span, here's the one-sentence summary:

The great first half of "Hellboy II" makes it worth seeing on the big screen, but the slow and disappointing second half should make you catch a matinee instead of paying full price.

The full review is after the jump.

Continue reading

Gay Batman or Vampire Liberace? We report, you decide!

I'm not sure what exact number it is, but somewhere on the "Big List of How To Make a Bad Super Costume" is "Make the whole thing pink and purple." For any questions regarding this vital tip, I point you to either Hawkeye or Dr. Strange's brother, the vampire:

drstrange-16-a-gaybatman.jpg

Now, in his defense, this guy was being mind-controlled by an immortal voodoo queen at the time. But still, even mind-controlled voodoo vampires have pride, or ought to. Besides the ghastliness of the color scheme, you have to wonder why a vampire -- who, let's not forget, can actually turn into a real bat! -- would need to dress up as a bat when in human form. Because if he wanted to look like a bat, wouldn't he just, you know, turn into a frigging bat?! The giant fake ears, the giant fake wing/cape, it's all unnecessary. It makes you wonder if, in his bat form, he wears a tiny little tuxedo and Count Dracula cape. "Look at me!" he would squeak, "I'm a human!"

Maybe the outfit is supposed to stun his victims, who would be torn between horror at the creeping undead about to consume them and convulsive laughter at the pink and purple big-eared Mardi Gras costume it was wearing.

Poll Position: Fatherhood

Not all fathers are super, but not all supers are good fathers. I'm not sure what brought it up this week, but I got to thinking about what makes a good father, and what makes a good super-hero, and whether there was much overlap between the two. The fact is, we don't have a lot of examples of comic book characters who are also parents, the notable exception being Reed and Sue Richards and their son Franklin. So here's our question of the week:

{democracy:37}

I included some villains in there too because hey, some people want to inherit the Evil Empire, you know? And I added a caveat that you won't inherit their powers because otherwise the question becomes basically "Whose powers do you want", which I've done before. I wanted to instead get you thinking about the qualities of fathers and supers and where the intermix.

From a purely mercenary perspective, of course, there are some people who would answer based on financial considerations -- why get Peter Parker's kitty full of nothin' when you could be the King of Latvia, after all? But then, you have to consider what Victor Von Doom would be like as a day-to-day dad.

I look forward to hearing what you all think about the choices, and why you choose what you do.

Politics and super-heroes

Barack Obama and John McCain were recently asked by Entertainment Weekly what super-hero they'd most like to be:

Sen. John McCain: "Batman. He does justice sometimes against insurmountable odds. And he doesn't make his good works known to a lot of people, so a lot of people think he's just a rich playboy."

Sen. Barack Obama: "I was always into the Spider-Man/Batman model. The guys who have too many powers, like Superman, that always made me think they weren't really earning their superhero status. It's a little too easy. Whereas Spider-Man and Batman, they have some inner turmoil. They get knocked around a little bit."

Sadly, the Pandering Mutant Gene is far too strong in any Presidential candidate to contemplate an answer to that question which is not Superman, Spider-Man, or Batman. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that those are the only three super-heroes either guy could name, and that's only because each character has had a major motion picture released in the last few years.

Is it too much to ask for one of them to want to be, say, "Rex the Wonder Dog" or "Pitt"? Think of how much good we could do with a muscle-bound, spittle-flicking gray-skinned President! It would at least make UN meetings much more entertaining:

The Iranian Ambassador: I would like to introduce UN Resolution 4534 which -- "
President Pitt: RRRRRAAAAARRRRRRGGGHHHHH!

With penetrating political insight like this, I eagerly await my invitation to join the op-ed pages of the Wall Street Journal. Or Time. National Enquirer? Throw me a bone here people!

(Hat-tip to Taegan Goddard's Political Wire.)

Sienkiewicz caricatures Mignola

On the last page of "Rocket Raccoon" no. 1 (originally published in 1985) is an article from editor Carl Potts about the team who put the series together. The penciller of the series was a very young Mike Mignola, who of course is now famous as the creator of "Hellboy" and "BPRD" as well as the winner of numerous Eisner Awards. But 23 years ago he was just starting out in the industry; here's what Potts had to say about him in the back of "Rocket Raccoon":

On the lower left is Mike Mignola. Mike's been around the field for a few years as an inker. Relatively recently he took up pencilling as well. You might remember his full art job on the Sub Mariner story in the back of MARVEL FANFARE #10. Lots of letters crying "more" came in after that one so here you go! After Mike finishes drawing all four issues of Rocket's limited series, he'll be laying out a few issues of the HULK (starting with #311). Shortly thereafter Mr. Mignola will be taking over the pencil pushing chores of ALPHA FLIGHT!

And the rest is, as they say, history. To cap off the article, legendary artist Bill Sienkiewicz draw an illustration of the four leads on the Rocket Raccoon series, and here's his version of Mr. Mignola:

mikemignola.jpg

Because nothing says "Macho Universe Destroying God" like a beer gut

As I mentioned in the Mashup credits, here’s a free tip for any of you comics industry bigwigs out there. If your project requires a scripter and a plotter, two pencillers, and three inkers, it’s going to suck. Witness “Trinity”, an unholy multi-space-going-comic-characters crossover featuring L.E.G.I.O.N., the Green Lantern Corps, and the Darkstars, with all of the cringe-inducing anticipation of crap you, the savvy reader, would expect.

What really caught my attention about this Space-Borne Spectacle of Suck, however, was the beer-belly-baring badness of Tzodar the Destroyer:

bad-trinity2.jpg

Here you can see just how large Tzodar's gut is by virtue of the unnamed hero getting unfortunately sucked into his belly button. Luckily, when you're a god you get to have the best fashion designers in the universe put together your outfits, which is why his armor has a convenient cut-out so his love handles can flop around in all their glory while he's busy destroying creation. "Oh no," I can hear you saying, "that's just an armor plate, not his stomach!" To which I can only reply, why do you hate America?

But that's not all this paragon of fashion has brought to the table my friends, oh no! Why stop at a Madonna-inspired midriff-baring ensemble when you can add a long, flowing pony tail and ridiculous cloud/stopwatch/what the hell is that?! logo to the mix!

bad-trinity1.jpg

Because nothing says "I'm a butch macho god" like a long greasy pony-tail and your ginormous bloated stomach hanging out of your shirt. At least that's what I've been assuming in my weekly jaunts to the local grocery store which, now that I mention it, might explain the strange looks and continued police presence I find there. A police presence which, frankly, would have been better off escorting those responsible for "Trinity" and Tzodar's outfit off to jail before they could have published this comic.

(Images from “Trinity”, No. 2, ©1993 DC Comics.)

Dark Knight review

Last weekend I was lucky enough to find myself in San Antonio with one of my best buds, Dave, going to not just one but two super-hero movies in the same night ("Dark Knight" and "Hell-Boy II"). Life, my friends, rarely gets better than good friends, good films, and Batman kicking people in the face. Which is exactly what I'm about to do, kicking out my review of "Dark Knight" for the two of you who have yet to see it. Quick summary of the review:

  1. More of a mob film that has silly outfits than a "super-hero movie".
  2. Batman rules, Superman drools (at least at the cinema).
  3. Heath Ledger's Joker: Best. Villain. Ever.
  4. Get off your butt and go see it already! It's now just below "Iron Man" on my "All-Time Great Super-Hero Movies" list.

Full review after the jump.

Continue reading

Just say no to krak

I never found the "Power Pack" comics appealing and I think part of the reason is the slightly creepy idea of skin-tight spandex uniforms on little kids. A (not so) subtle sexual component is absolutely part of the super-hero genre, with the lycra and veiled bondage and rippling muscles and exaggerated cleavage; putting kids into that is uncomfortable, even when (as in the case of Power Pack) the stories and characters are handled very well.

Which makes this confluence of onomontoPOWia and butt-crack-revealing adventure-wear so unfortunate:

powerpack-13-c-cracks.jpg

Remember kids, don't do crack, and don't show crack. Words to live by.

(Image from “Power Pack”, Vol. 1, No. 16, ©1985 Marvel Comics Group.)

Broken deadline or broken back? You be the judge!

I like to imagine that the end of Wanda's sentence which starts with "Where --":

she-hulk-21-c-shutupwanda.jpg

would be "-- is the rest of my torso, as it's anatomically impossible for it to fit behind your back? And as long as we're at it, why are my legs broken at the knee?"

Of course she's missing a couple of arms too, so maybe broken legs and a grotesquely distorted torso are the least of her troubles. Plus her haircut's ugly and her glasses look stolen from Elton John's private stash.

All in all, I'd say Wanda's having a very bad day, but it's probably just a case of the fill-in artist being rushed for time, leaving out key bits of anatomy here and there to make deadline. Either way, it's a good thing She-Hulk's actually an attorney, because I'd bet my last dollar someone's getting sued because of all this.

(Image from “She-Hulk”, Vol. 2, No. 21, ©1990, Marvel Entertainment Group.)

Fiasco, thy name is "Spider-Mobile"

I usually try to keep my "Bad Super Costume" posts about actual humanoids, but when something is so awesomely bad that even the guy who owns it calls it a fiasco, I cannot resist. Ladies and gentlemen, I present ... the Spider-Mobile!

spiderman-2-a-spidermobilefiasco.jpg

Besides looking silly, which, let's be honest, isn't saying much considering it's going to be driven by a guy dressed up like a blue and red spider, let's run down the many ways this idea sucks:

  1. It's a dune-buggy. In Manhattan. Last time I checked, all the dunes there were paved over in, like, 1634.
  2. It's a dune-buggy. In Manhattan. Last time I checked, all the roads there are already clogged with vehicles, making a car the last thing someone would use to get someplace in a hurry. Spider-Taxi, now, that has promise ...
  3. It was built by Johnny Storm who, frankly, is number four on the list of Fantastic Four members you'd trust with a wrench.
  4. One of Spidey's nicknames is "The Wallcrawler". You can't climb walls while you're riding in a car, and "Driver of Car That Climbs Walls" isn't nearly as punchy.

Seriously, I get that Marvel wanted to move some product in the toy stores, and they were insanely jealous of the Batmobile. But come on. Putting Spidey in a vehicle robs him of everything that makes him cool. He can't climb walls or spin webs or dodge and weave or in any other way act like a spider. Yes, the vehicle can do some of those things, but the vehicle isn't Spider-Man. Technology and doo-dads are part of Batman's persona, but not Spider-Man. Giving him a car is almost as bad an idea as taking away Superman's powers and making him lightning-based instead, although no one would be stupid enough to do something so obviously foolish! Oh, wait ...

To their credit, the writers at the time understood, I think, how silly the whole idea was. A company sponsored the build and wanted to pay Spider-Man to drive it, which he reluctantly agreed to eventually out of desperation and a desire to, you know, be able to afford pizza. It turned out poorly and he eventually dumped it in the river. Where a villain recovered it and reprogrammed it for evil.

Which couldn't have been that hard because, come on, the Spider-Mobile was pretty evil by the mere fact of its existence in the first place.